Women wanted to stand on their own two feet, and now their feet are starting to hurt

The title for this post came from what I thought was a quippy comment on my Facebook page after I’d posted the transcription of a conversation between radio host Dennis Prager and one of his callers, Jennifer, who wanted to offer some advice to young women.

Simply put, she warned women that feminism is a lie.

“You do act like ‘My career is everything. I love working,’ she said. But it’s a lie on the inside for me. It’s unfortunate. I didn’t realize this until it’s too late. I don’t know if it’s too late. I would like to find somebody to go on vacation with.”

She goes on:

Somebody asked me the other day, ‘Why did you stay single and never have kids?’ There’s not a good answer for it except I was programmed to get into the workforce, compete with men and make money. Supposedly, that would be a fulfilling life. But I was told that by my feminist mother who was divorced, who hated her husband — my father.

I didn’t realize this until late in life.

I want to tell women: Find someone in your 20s. That’s when you’re still very cute. That’s when you’re still amiable to working out problems with someone. It’s harder in your 50s, when you’ve lived alone, to compromise with someone, to have someone in your home and every little thing about them annoys you because you’re so used to being alone. It’s hard to undo that, so don’t do what I did. Find someone in your 20s.”

After I posted this article, there were the usual number of comments; but one exchange between a man named Scott and a woman named Sarah focused on the reasons why women in particular have a hard time finding a husband.

Sarah: Men don’t have a biological timeframe … it’s different for us. Having said that, it’s not easy to meet a decent honest family man who wants marriage and family now so you guys can’t be so quick to blame women, got to look at all angles and have compassion too! Most men are not providers anymore!

Steve: Why should we be providers? Do you feel men have a moral obligation to do so? Men provided for women who needed them and the women leaned on them and provided domestic support in return.

Sarah: How can a woman do and have it all if she also has to provide?? Women should stop having sex with men unless they are a provider husband.

Steve: I don’t disagree with your last statement, but there is a lot more that women need to change in their behavior besides withhold sex from men until they provide for you.

Sarah: But like I said, most men are not providers anymore. My father was a provider, so was my granddad etc. in their twenties!! Most men in their twenties these days are useless!

Steve: So which came first, the chicken or the egg?

And there it is. Which did come first: the chicken or the egg?

We know the answer to this. It was women who changed the rules. It is women who told men, in no uncertain terms, that they don’t need them anymore. They can stand on their own two feet and do everything by themselves. But can they? And why would they want to? What was the point of it all? To prove…what exactly?

I agree with the caller about women finding someone in their 20s, though statistically mid-twenties is better than early twenties; and even then, they’ll have to look for an older man because twenty-something men are too busy with their bachelor lifestyle since women now make themselves available to them for “free.”

The combination of the birth control pill and the sexual revolution, when women were encouraged to have sex like a man—casually, with no strings attached—permanently altered the state of gender relations. Men now expect sex and can thus postpone adulthood as long as they want.

Which leaves marriage-minded women in a rut, for it is significantly harder now for them to find a husband. The rules have changed, and we haven’t replaced them with anything better.

Perhaps it’s time to return to the old rules.

Suzanne Venker

Suzanne Venker is an author, columnist and radio host known as The Feminist Fixer. She helps free women from feminism so they can find lasting love with men. Suzanne's newest book, WOMEN WHO WIN at Love: How to Build a Relationship That Lasts, will be published October 2019.

Reader Interactions


  1. I would assert to you that “Men now expect sex and can thus postpone adulthood as long as they want.” Frankly there is a huge issue here, because becoming an adult means taking responsibility for yourself. Now, if you consider that settling down, for a man today, means he is committed, but she never is, how does that work? If we consider the reality of society, him allowing himself to be made into a provider essentially means he is handing her the power to destroy his life, without any return security. Contracts need to have two sides, and the courts and feminism have removed that for men in most places. To truly be an adult, he would need to consider this. He would also need to consider what his life’s experiences are. You will note the current generation is having radically LESS sex, and yet, still delaying marriage. You will note, that the “she doesn’t owe him” has resulted in a reality that men do not have cause to expect sex after marriage either.

    When you say old rules, most women are thinking 1970s, oddly, men are looking at how stay home moms behaved then, and frankly too many are hearing about the getting together to complain about their husbands. Also note that it was the stay home moms of 2011, who thought the Sharon Osbourne bit about laughing at a man who wanted divorce from his abusive wife, when she drugged him and sexually dismembered him. That is. 3.5 million women, watching at home, where lots of sons saw mom laugh along. What conclusions would those boys have reached? What about other men, who see her career helped and not hurt by this? The reality of Wendy Williams saying lying to your husband to get pregnant, and that being supported by the women who watch that show – (again stay home).

    It needs to be understood, that men want partnership, and love. It needs to be asked, is that seen to be on offer? What old rules? Because rewinding to the 1970s seems to be asking him to simply accept that she does not care, and he should provide anyway. It suggests that he should be prepared to be disposable at her whim. Note where we went with domestic abuse, she beats him that is fine, he defends himself he is the monster. He calls police he will be arrested for abuse, those rules? They flow most directly from the 1970s as well. The rules need to be looked at, and there are a lot of women coming to understand this, but the reality that we have not been prepared to look at the reality of women as abuser, has deeply damaged trust.

    • Great comments, Malcolm. To the points you raised in the first paragraph, I would add that the expectations women hold do not take a back seat. These are expectations of benevolent sexism & implicit objectification (but don’t outwardly, explicitly objectify them). These expectations, many of which are adopted and internalized by the vast majority of men, start well before the first date (i.e. the man approaches and asks [never mind she’s almost assured to not be of any value to him], whomever asks then pays for the date[s], the man is supposed to plan the date, he’s supposed to be exciting, entertaining, fun, generous, etc). Since society is steeped in feminine primacy at this point, everything gets framed from that standpoint.

      And what’s the tool to coerce men or try to get them to adhere to the expectations of the Feminine Imperative? Shame… As soon as shame comes into the picture, intellectual honesty, rational thought, and logic have been discarded and replaced with (negative) appeals to the emotional body, or to put it another way, a form of emotional abuse. It is time to call out the “hidden” abuse when it rears its head, because this is the realm women operate within, with each other and with men.

      • It is that when men will then not deviate from logic- they are quickly attacked as misogynist. It is even more interesting that so many women get angry about things like mgtow. It is that suddenly men who do not wish to participate – are selfish and lazy – and this narrative comes hard on the heels of one where ‘marriage is the enslavement of women’. That is, we have gone very nearly directly from asserting that men who wanted marriage were monsters- to men wishing to stay clear are. Note that when a man tries to flirt – it has been until recently that this was predatory – now suddenly it is that men not wanting to – need to do their duty.

        The reaction to men pulling back – starting with anger is remarkable damaging. The reality of responding to the damage to boys education with “a shortage of marriageable men” is also remarkably damaging – because this women centered reaction on things that involve harm to men, and private choices men make, reinforces a conclusion already being formed – women simply do not care. There are many women who do care, but oddly, they have been shamed into silence, or led to believe that men would suffer no harm. Now – well their daughters are looking at the wreckage, their sons seeing indifference, where in some cases it was ignorance. However – the reality of feminist being believed, while they spread horrid and transparent lies, will by nature be that women did not care.

  2. You said: Somebody asked me the other day, ‘Why did you stay single and never have kids?’ There’s not a good answer for it except I was programmed to get into the workforce, compete with men and make money. Supposedly, that would be a fulfilling life. But I was told that by my feminist mother who was divorced, who hated her husband — my father.

    Well, that is feminists- full of hatred. Yep, the best place to get advice, on how to make marriage work, is from people who don’t know how to make marriage work. People full of hatred may not offer the best advice, huh?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: